Hyperlawhypertext legal database Harrington v. Hamilton B. Wills & Co. 204 A.D. 860

← Cases

Harrington v. Hamilton B. Wills & Co.

204 A.D. 860 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 860
Norman B. Harrington, Respondent, v. Hamilton B. Wills & Co., Ltd., Appellant.

Motion to amend decision [See 203 App. Div. 878 ] denied, upon the ground that section 117 of the Civil Practice Act[1] does not provide for a preclusion order in this case, and that the decision in MacDonald v. Wills & Co., Ltd. ( 199 App. Div. 902 , 911) is not a precedent, for the reason that in that case there were affirmative allegations in the answer.

* Sic. See Civ. Prac. Act, § 247.— [Rep.