Hyperlawhypertext legal database Biel v. Harkin 206 A.D. 621

← Cases

Biel v. Harkin

206 A.D. 621 Court Second Department, Docket Appeal No. 1 English

Contents

Majority

p. 621
Second Department,
March, 1923.
William Biel and Leonard Biel, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Biel & Biel, Respondents, v. Frank A. Harkin, Appellant, and Carmen E. Harkin, Defendant.
(Appeal No. 1.)

This motion having been renewed after the complaint herein was amended, and the order denying that motion having been affirmed (Biel v. Harkin, No. 2, post, p. 621), this appeal is dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.