Sneck v. Loeb

206 A.D. 649 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 649

Howard W. Sneck, Respondent, v. Sol S. Loeb, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur; Davis, J., not sitting. Even though there might have been a technical error in the admission of evidence, the verdict

p. 650

shows that the defendant was allowed the counterclaim and it, therefore, does not constitute a reversible error.