← Cases

Potter v. Potter

208 A.D. 746 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 746
Sarah C. Potter, Respondent, v. Howard M. Potter, Appellant.

While the evidence of plaintiff is not very satisfactory, we think there was sufficient to justify the findings of fact made by the learned trial justice, and as the time limit of the separation has nearly expired, we have concluded to affirm the judgment. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Kelly, P. J., Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Jaycox and Manning, JJ., dissent.