← Cases

Balthasar v. J. A. Migel, Inc.

212 A.D. 879 Court N.Y. App. Div. Docket Appeal No. 1 English

Contents

Majority

p. 879
Arthur Balthasar, Respondent, v. J. A. Migel, Inc., Appellant.
(Appeal No. 1.)

Order modified by striking out the requirement of a further bill of particulars as to demands 8, 10, 12, 13, 16 and 18, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.