Majority
Headnote
Municipal corporations — streets — condemnation to acquire former railroad bed for street uses — railroad claims property is being used for railroad purposes and cannot be acquired for street uses — proceedings by railroad in 1906 under Railroad Law, § 62 (now § 91) furnishes express legislative authority for this proceedings—railroad by continuing to use right of way for switching track after main tracks had been elevated for purpose of eliminating grade crossing cannot bar right of city.We would affirm this judgment upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Taylor at Special Term except for the fact that we do not agree with his conclusion of law that the sole statutory authority under which this proceeding is taken is the Condemnation Law; because we think the proceedings in 1905, instituted by the railroad company for elimination of grade • crossings under former section 62 (now section 91)[1] of the Railroad Law followed by the determination of the Board of Railroad Commissioners in 1907, accepted by all the parties without appeal, furnishes express legislative authority for this proceeding, in addition to the ordinary requirements of the Condemnation Law. In that statutory proceeding in 1905-1907 the railroad company, asserting its desire to eliminate grade crossings, agreed to abandon the operation of its railroad on the property now sought to be condemned, and to construct and operate its railroad at this point on an elevated structure. On this theory of the abandonment of the operation at grade with the resulting additional safety to the public, the railroad company obtained the payment
* See Railroad Law of 1890, § 62, added by Laws of 1897, chap. 754, as amd. by Laws of 1899, chap. 359; re-enacted and amd. by Laws of 1909, chap. 153; revised by Railroad Law of 1910, § 91, as amd. by Laws of 1911, chap. 141; Laws of 1913, chaps. 354, 744; Laws of 1914, chap. 378, and Laws of 1921, chap. 698.—[Rep.
The judgment should be affirmed, with cpsts.
Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Kapper, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.