← Cases

Orofino v. Lauria

215 A.D. 687 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 687
Antonio Orofino, Doing Business under the Firm Name, etc., Respondent, v. Maria Amalia Lauria, Appellant.

Order denying defendant’s motion for leave to renew a motion to open a default affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.