Prout v. Mirsky

216 A.D. 814 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 814

Anita N. Prout, Respondent, v. Morris Mirsky, Appellant.

Judgment of the City Court of New Rochelle reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that there is no evidence justifying a recovery. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.