Quinn v. Central New England Railway Co.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The legal effect of the ruling at folios 156 and 157 of the record on appeal, of which defendant complains, was that plaintiff’s proof was sufficient to show that the parties were engaged in interstate commerce when plaintiff was injured. It did not prevent defendant from offering any available proof on the subject. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ.