Majority
Upon reargument, we adhere to our former decision in this case,[1] which points out that the decision is without prejudice to an application under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act.[2] The allowances made under sections 278 and 279 of the Surrogate’s Court Act[3] are costs in the accounting proceeding. We do not now pass upon the power of the surrogate to grant allowances under section 231-a. Order signed. Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ.
* See 218 App. Div. 845 ; 219 id. 734.— [Rep.
† † Added by Laws of 1923, chap. 526.— [Rep.
‡ ‡ Since respectively amd. by Laws of 1923, chaps. 527, 525; Laws of 1925, chap. 581, and Laws of 1924, chap. 415.— [Rep.