Majority
p. 825Felix Q. Rast, Respondent, v. Pipe and Tube Bending Corporation of America, Appellant,[1]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents upon the ground that the alleged contract for the additional 4,000 machines is indefinite and lacks mutuality.