Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Borton v. McClintic Marshall Co. 226 A.D. 709

← Cases

Claim of Borton v. McClintic Marshall Co.

226 A.D. 709 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 709
In the Matter of the Claim of Adeline V. Borton, Respondent, against McClintic Marshall Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. . Van Kirk, P. J., Davis, Hill and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Hinman, J., dissents on the ground that there is no evidence to sustain the finding that the claimant was the common-law wife of deceased; and on the authority of Hill v. Vrooman ( 215 App. Div. 847 ; affd., 242 N. Y. 549 ).