← Cases

Lichtenstein v. J. Ohl, Inc.

226 A.D. 812 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 812
Michael Lichtenstein, Respondent, v. J. Ohl, Inc., and Joseph Ohl, Appellants.

Order granting plaintiff’s motion for injunction pendente lite and order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.