← Cases

Goldberg v. Blank

226 A.D. 863 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Decision Majority · Dissent — Proskauer, J. (dissenting).

Contents
p. 863
Hyman H. Goldberg, Respondent, v. Arthur Blank and Another, Individually and as Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Consolidated Gas Iron Company, Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, MeAvoy and Proskauer, JJ.; Proskauer, J., dissents.

In my opinion the referee incorrectly and inexactly fixed the items “ Collection expense on old accounts collected up to Dec. 19, 1925,” “ Overhead, including surcharge, involved in the collection of said accounts up to Dec. 19, 1925,” and “ Proportion of overhead expense allowed on collection of old accounts ” after December 19, 1925. These items should have been fixed respectively at $5,199.20, $8,074.11 and $2,249. The allowance to the plaintiff was excessive. For these reasons I dissent from the affirmance of the judgment.