Majority
p. 644City of Schenectady, Respondent, v. Charles D. Beckwith and Others, Appellants.[1]
Order affirmed, with costs. Van Kirk, P. J., Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Hinman and Hasbrouck, JJ., dissent on the ground that it was the duty of the commissioners to consider lots Nos. 16 and 17 as a unit in making their award.