Creighton v. New York State Railways

227 A.D. 841 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 841

Seth Creighton, Appellant, v. New York State Railways, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. AU concur, except Taylor and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the ground that the questions of negUgence and contributory negligence were fairly questions of fact for the jury. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.