Ostrow v. Raysec Corp.

231 A.D. 755 Court N.Y. App. Div. Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 755

Frederick J. Ostrow, Respondent, v. Raysec Corporation, Appellant, and Roy E. Thompson, Defendant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order denying motion of defendant Raysec Corporation for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence reversed upon the law and the facts and motion granted, with costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that a new trial should be had in the interests of substantial justice. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.