Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Mintz v. State Insurance 231 A.D. 783

← Cases

Claim of Mintz v. State Insurance

231 A.D. 783 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 783
In the Matter of the Claim of David Mintz, Appellant, against The State Insurance Fund, Insurance Carrier, and Artistic Dyeing Co., Inc., Employer, Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Decision reversed and claim remitted for further action, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, as the undisputed evidence shows an accidental injury within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur.