Smith v. Trepel Florist, Inc.

231 A.D. 844 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 844

Mae Smith, Formerly Mae Griffith, Respondent, v. Trepel Florist, Inc., Defendant, and A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., Sued Herein as A. I. Namm Company, Appellant.

Judgment against appellant, A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that plaintiff failed to establish a cause of action against said appell nt. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.