← Cases

Claim of Helfrick v. Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co.

232 A.D. 710 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 710
In the Matter of the Claim of Paul Helfrick, Respondent, against Dahlstrom Metallic Door Company and Another, Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Motion for reargument and for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied. Decision[1] is amended to state that the constitutional question raised by the appellants is overruled; and in affirming the award this court did not review the facts, except to ascertain that there was evidence to sustain the finding, but accepted the decision of the Board as final in accordance with the provisions of section 20 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.[2]

* See 231 App. Div. 775 , 776.- — ■ [Rep.

† † Amd. by Laws of 1928, chap. 754.— [Rep.