Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Thina v. Azersky 232 A.D. 710

← Cases

Claim of Thina v. Azersky

232 A.D. 710 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 710
In the Matter of the Claim of Thina (Tina) Bodneland, Respondent, against Sam Azersky and Another, Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. In the Matter of the Claim of Catherine McMorrow, Respondent, against New York Consolidated Railroad Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.— Motion for reargument and for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.