Hyperlawhypertext legal database Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corp. 232 A.D. 756

← Cases

Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corp.

232 A.D. 756 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 756
Henry S. Chittick, Appellant, v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, Respondents, and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Henby S. Chittick, Appellant, v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, Respondents, and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Motion for reargument denied, but without prejudice to an application for leave under rule 19.[1] Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ.

* See App. Div. Rules, 2d Dept., rule 19 — ÍRep.