Hyperlawhypertext legal database Tamburrino v. Jayen Building Corp. 233 A.D. 868

← Cases

Tamburrino v. Jayen Building Corp.

233 A.D. 868 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 868
Philip Tamburrino, Respondent, v. Jayen Building Corporation, Appellant, and Sam Shapiro and Joseph Stolman, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Shapiro & Stolman, Defendants.[1]

Judgment affirmed,

p. 869
with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal upon the ground that there is no proof in the case that the general contractor knew or had reason to know that the place where the accident happened was to be used for the purpose for which it was used.