Werle v. Stockinger

233 A.D. 886 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 886

John Werle, Appellant, v. Fred Stockinger and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hill and Rhodes, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal, on the law, and a new trial on the ground that the trial court erroneously excluded the admissions contained in a letter written by defendant’s agent Lyons.