← Cases

Seidenberg v. Burwell

234 A.D. 780 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 780
In the Matter of the Application of Hugo Seidenberg and Rose Seidenberg, Appellants, for a Mandamus Order against Edward P. Burwell, Superintendent of Buildings of the Borough of Queens, City of New York, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied upon condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the January, 1932, term (for which term the case is set down) and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, -with ten dollars costs. Present—-Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ.