← Cases

Cassent v. Utyro

234 A.D. 786 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 786
Edward J. Cassent, Respondent, v. Viktoria Utyro, Appellant.

Order modified by striking therefrom the words “ Ordered that the counterclaim be and the same is dismissed; and it is further,” and by providing that, in addition to paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9, paragraph 15 be stricken out. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 constitute a counterclaim and they should not have been stricken out. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.