Hyperlawhypertext legal database Ecker v. Walton-Manhattan Corp. 234 A.D. 825

← Cases

Ecker v. Walton-Manhattan Corp.

234 A.D. 825 Court First Department, English

Decision Majority · Dissent — Martin, J.

Contents
p. 825
First Department,
December, 1931.
Isidor Ecker, Appellant, v. Walton-Manhattan Corporation, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on May 20, 1931.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ. All concur, but Martin, J., who dissents,

(dissenting). I dissent. The judgment for the defendant on the counterclaim should be reversed and judgment granted for the plaintiff.