Hester v. Bull — 236 A.D. 638

Majority

p. 638

H. C. Kendall Hester, Appellant, v. Henry W. Bull and Others, Copartners, Doing Business as Harriman & Company, Respondents.

First Department,

December 9, 1932.

p. 639

Victor E. Cappa of counsel [Knowlton Durham, attorney], for the appellant.

George J. McDonnell of counsel [McDonnell & Lebett, attorneys], for the respondents.

For the reasons given in Martin v. Bull ( 236 App. Div. 637 ), decided herewith, the order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.