← Cases

Seidman v. Eastern Pearl Button Works, Inc.

236 A.D. 755 Court Second Department, English

Contents

Majority

p. 755
Second Department,
September, 1932.
Abraham D. Seidman, Respondent, v. Eastern Pearl Button Works, Incorporated, Appellant.

On argument, order directing a discovery and inspection affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; inspection to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.