Majority
p. 820Fourth Department, October, 1932. Budd Boyer, Appellant, v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Respondent.
Even if it be a matter of doubt whether the learned trial court based his order granting a new trial upon a review of the testimony presented at the instant trial, rather than upon the opinion of the Appellate Division rendered after the first trial[1] (See Ougel v. Hiscox, 216 N. Y. 145 ), we reach the conclusion that the verdict now under review is so clearly against the weight of the evidence[2] that the order appealed from should be affirmed. All concur. Order affirmed, with costs.
* See 233 App. Div. 150 .—[Rep.
† † Verdict was for $15,000 in action for personal injuries.— [Rep.
Cases cited
- Gugel v. Hiscox 216 N. Y. 145 p. 820