← Cases

Siegel v. Seidenberg

237 A.D. 129 Court First Department, Decision date 1932-12-20 English

Contents

Majority

p. 129
Philip Siegel, Respondent, v. Seidenberg, Heroes & Dratfield, Inc., Defendant, Impleaded with Louis Rothstein, Appellant.
First Department,
December 20, 1932.
Harmon Ackerman of counsel [Edyth Widdi with him on the brief], for the appellant.
Jacdb M. Zinaman, for the respondent.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. A judgment directing the payment of a sum of money is enforcible only by execution. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 504, 505; Harris v. Elliott, 163 N. Y. 269 .)

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Cases cited