Hyperlawhypertext legal database Priola v. City of New York 237 A.D. 827

← Cases

Priola v. City of New York

237 A.D. 827 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 827
Nellie Priola, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.[1]

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the plaintiff established a prima jade

p. 828
ease that the street in question was a public street, and that the defendant offered no evidence to the contrary. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents on authority of Nichols Copper Co. v. Connolly ( 208 App. Div. 667 ; affd., 240 N. Y. 596 ), and eases cited therein at page 677.