Sorblum v. Travelers Insurance

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. While the admission of the indorsement upon plaintiff’s Exhibit 8 was error, we are of the opinion that in view of the other evidence it was not prejudicial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs for affirmance, being of the opinion that the entry in the government records was admissible in evidence under section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act.