Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Eisenberg v. Erie Railroad 240 A.D. 790

← Cases

Claim of Eisenberg v. Erie Railroad

240 A.D. 790 Court Third Department, English

Decision Majority · Dissent — Rhodes, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 790
Third Department,
September, 1933.
In the Matter of the Claim of Harold Eisenberg, Respondent, against Erie Railroad Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Crapser Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents, with a memorandum.

(dissenting). I dissent. The claimant worked substantially the whole of the year preceding his injury, but was a five-day worker. The wage

Dissent

p. 791
rate should, therefore, be computed in accordance with subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See Matter of Remmert v. Weidenmeyer, 237 App. Div. 147 ; affd., 262 N. Y.-.)