Devereux v. Cox

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. There is a variance between what the title company was willing to insure and what the contract required. The survey did not ind cate a possibility of boundary dispute between the owner of the premises and the owner of premises adjoining to the north. This possibility was indicated by the title company as an exception. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.