Union Trust Co. v. Francis

242 A.D. 674 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 674

Union Trust Company of Rochester, Appellant, v. George E. Francis, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that it was within the discretion of the Special Term to deny the motion inasmuch as it was not made within ten days after the service of the amended answer (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 109; Hale v. Hirsch, 205 App. Div. 308 ), and no explanation of the laches was offered. AH concur.