Hall v. New York Telephone Co. — 242 A.D. 880

Majority

p. 880

Harriet Hall, Appellant, v. New York Telephone Company, Respondent.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs.. Rhodes, McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Heffeman, J., dissent. (Tremblay v. Harmony Mills, 171 N. Y. 598 ; Crounse v. Sager, 224 App. Div. 10 ; Hughes v. Borden’s Farm Products Co., Inc., 252 N. Y. 532 ; Keegan v. Hohorst, 261 id. 566 .)

Cases cited

Tremblay v. Harmony Mills 171 N. Y. 598 N.Y. 1902-06-27 p. 880
Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Co. 252 N. Y. 532 N.Y. 1929-10-22 p. 880