Majority
p. 568
In the Matter of the Application of Rudolph Inderbitzen, Respondent, for a Mandamus Order against City of Buffalo and Others, Appellants.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Matter of Schmidt v. Board of Supervisors, 244 App. Div. 493 , and Holton v. Board of Supervisors, 245 id. 144.) All concur. (The alternative mandamus order directs petitioner’s reinstatement.) Present — Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.