Hyperlawhypertext legal database Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co. 247 A.D. 786

← Cases

Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co.

247 A.D. 786 Court N.Y. App. Div. Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 786
Rose Nicoletti and Anthony Nicoletti, Appellants, v. Union Railway Company of New York City, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)

Defendant moved at Special Term for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs

p. 787
had not complied with an ex parte order requiring them to furnish security for costs. Said motion was granted, and judgment entered. Judgment and order granting motion to dismiss complaint reversed, without costs, and motion denied. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.