Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Garelick v. Rosen 248 A.D. 924

← Cases

Claim of Garelick v. Rosen

248 A.D. 924 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1936-10-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 924
In the Matter of the Claim of Samuel Garelick, Respondent, against Hyman Rosen and Maryland Casualty Company, Appellants. Zach Fishkin and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

The statement in Matter of Orlando v. Rosen [ante, p. 924], decided herewith, is applicable to this case. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents on the ground stated in his dissent in Matter of Orlando v. Rosen [ante, p. 924], decided herewith.