← Cases

Heisten v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.

249 A.D. 603 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1936-11-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 603
William Heisten, Respondent, v. Beech-Nut Packing Company, Appellant.

— Order unanimously modified by eliminating the provision for examination through Bartlett Arkell, and by striking from the last paragraph of the order the words “ with leave to plaintiff to inspect and make copies or photostats thereof,” and by providing that there may be a limited inspection and use of papers and documents under the rule laid down in Zeltner v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. ( 220 App. Div. 21 ), and as so modified affirmed, without costs. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Dore, JJ.