← Cases

Vigno v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

249 A.D. 784 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1936-12-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 784
Charles Vigno, an Incompetent Person, by His Committee, Teresa Vigno, Appellant, v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Respondent.

Order on reargument dismissing the complaint under rule 107, subdivision 6, of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that the alleged action was barred by the Statute of Limitations, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.