Pfeil v. Hasselbush

249 A.D. 817 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1937-01-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 817

Charles Pfeil, Appellant, v. August C. Hasselbush and Edward C. Tinker, Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 766.] The following question is certified: Do the facts set forth in the second paragraph of the amended answer constitute a defense to the cause of action set forth in the complaint? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.; Close, J., not voting.