Henig v. Padgug

254 A.D. 657 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1938-04-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 657

Moe Henig, as Administrator, etc., of Pauline Henig, Respondent, v. Annette Padgug, Appellant.

Viewing the plaintiff’s evidence in its most favorable light, there was no proof of actionable negligence on the part of the defendant. Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.