People ex rel. O'Brien v. Caldwell Manufacturing Co.

Majority

p. 886

The People of the State of New York ex rel. John G. O’Brien, Appellant, v. Caldwell Manufacturing Co., Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The order appealed from must be affirmed for two reasons: (1) Leave to renew the motion was a condition precedent. No application for such relief was made. (2) The prior order fully determined the matter here litigated. (Sheehan v. Carvalho, 12 App. Div. 430 ; Haskell v. Moran, 117 id. 251; De Lacy v. Kelly, 147 id. 37; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1332;, Riggs v. Pursell, 74 N. Y. 370 , 378; Matter of Livingston, 34 id. 555, 577; People ex rel. Hartford, L. Ins. Co. v. Fairman, 91 id. 385, 387; Belmont v. Erie R. Co., 52 Barb. 637 ; Veeder v. Baker, 83 N. Y. 156 , 163; United States v. Louisville & Nash. R. R., 236 U. S. 318 , 334; Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp., 270 N. Y. 464 , 465; Matter of Steinway, 159 id. 250; People ex rel. Hasbrouck v. Supervisors, 135 id. 522, 535.) All concur. The order denies permission to relator to examine certain records of a corporation.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ. [See, also, 253 App. Div. 870 ; affd., 278 N. Y. 520 .]

Cases cited

Riggs v. Pursell 74 N. Y. 370 N.Y. 1878-09-17 at 378 p. 886
Belmont v. Erie Railway Co. 52 Barb. 637 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1869-01-04 p. 886
Veeder v. Baker 83 N. Y. 156 N.Y. 1880-12-07 at 163 p. 886
United States ex rel. McReynolds v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad 236 U. S. 318 SCOTUS 1915-02-23 at 334 p. 886
Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp. 270 N. Y. 464 N.Y. 1936-04-14 at 465 p. 886
People ex rel. O'Brien v. Caldwell Manufacturing Co. 278 N. Y. 520 N.Y. 1938-05-17 p. 886