← Cases

Murray v. Neal

256 A.D. 888 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1939-01-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 888
Joseph Murray, Respondent, v. M. Prouse Neal, as Administrator, etc., of Ulrich Heiserer, Deceased, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We find no errors of law or fact in this case. Claims such as plaintiff’s are always subject to the closest scrutiny, but, from the whole record, we gain the impression that the plaintiff made out a meritorious case and that the award was reasonable in amount. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff on a claim against an estate for care furnished decedent.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.