Hyperlawhypertext legal database Murphy v. Feinberg 258 A.D. 1088

← Cases

Murphy v. Feinberg

258 A.D. 1088 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1940-02-26 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1088
Mary J. Murphy, A. Margaret Murphy, Hugh C. Murphy and Daniel Murphy, Partners, Doing Business under the Name and Style of “ Murphy’s Duck Farm ” at Eastport, N. Y., Respondents, Appellants, v. David Feinberg, Appellant, Respondent.

Action for goods sold and delivered. Order of the County Court of Suffolk County denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment

p. 1089
against the defendant, and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment against the plaintiffs affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.