← Cases

Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins

259 A.D. 888 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1940-05-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 888
Chase Watch Corp., Appellant, v. Irving Heins, Respondent.

Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision on the prior motion. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ. The motion is granted to the extent of amending the decision of this court handed down February 5, 1940 [ 258 App. Div. 1054 ], to read as follows: Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See 258 App. Div. 968 .] The following question of law is certified as one which in our opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: Should the motion to vacate the execution issued against the person of the defendant have been granted? Order dated February 5, 1940, resettled accordingly. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.