Hyperlawhypertext legal database Cranston v. Rochester Central Properties, Inc. 261 A.D. 1051

← Cases

Cranston v. Rochester Central Properties, Inc.

261 A.D. 1051 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1941-03-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1051
William Cranston, Appellant, v. Rochester Central Properties, Inc., Defendant, and Domenica Cusimano, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of “ Caruso’s Restaurant,” Respondent.

Order reversed on the law and facts and verdict reinstated, with costs in both courts. All concur, except Cunningham, J., not voting, (The order sets aside a verdict of the jury in favor of plain

p. 1052
tiff and grants a new trial in an action for damages by reason of an icy sidewalk.) Present — Crosby, P. J„ Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCum, JJ.*' 111