← Cases

Sperling v. Lichtenstein

261 A.D. 940 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1941-03-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 940
Claude M. Sperling, Respondent, v. Leo Lichtenstein, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Harlich Manufacturing Company, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified by permitting defendant to replead as to the item of $321.60, representing a claim for credits and samples, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.